mirror of
				https://github.com/open-metadata/OpenMetadata.git
				synced 2025-10-30 18:17:53 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
	
	
		
			84 lines
		
	
	
		
			4.4 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
	
	
			84 lines
		
	
	
		
			4.4 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
|   | --- | |||
|  | title: Enable Secrets Manager | |||
|  | slug: /deployment/secrets-manager | |||
|  | --- | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | # Enable Secrets Manager
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | Secret Manager integrations allow you to use your existing third-party **Key Management Store** (KMS) with OpenMetadata.  | |||
|  | Your credentials and sensitive information are stored in a tool that you control, and the KMS will mediate between any  | |||
|  | OpenMetadata internal requirement and sensitive information. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | Without a secret manager configured in OpenMetadata, all your sensitive data, any password field of a service connection  | |||
|  | parameters, bot credentials configuration or dbt configuration of an ingestion pipeline, were stored in MySQL (or  | |||
|  | Postgres) encrypted. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | The following diagram shows how is the process between the OM server and Airflow workflows: | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | {% image src="/images/v1.4/deployment/secrets-manager/om-secrets-manager-disabled.png" alt="om-secrets-manager-disabled" /%} | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | As you can see, the `Workflow` consumed by Airflow contains the service information as an `EntityReference`. We use that  | |||
|  | reference to read the Service information, including its connection details. This information goes from  | |||
|  | `Database > OM > Airflow`. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | When the Secrets Manager is enabled, sensitive information stop being stored in any system from OpenMetadata. Instead,  | |||
|  | the KMS will act as a mediator, as we can observe in the diagram below: | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | {% image src="/images/v1.4/deployment/secrets-manager/om-secrets-manager-enabled.png" alt="om-secrets-manager-enabled" /%} | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | In 0.13 and up, OpenMetadata will communicate through an interface to read/write sensitive information -- removing the  | |||
|  | need to store sensitive data in OM systems. This new interface works whether users keep using the underlying database of  | |||
|  | OpenMetadata to store credentials (as it was set up thus far) or any external system such as AWS Secrets Manager or AWS  | |||
|  | SSM Parameter Store. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | In future releases, we will add support for additional Key Management Stores, such as Azure Key Vault or Kubernetes  | |||
|  | Secrets. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | If you’d like to contribute by creating the interface, check the implementation guide, or if you want to see a new one  | |||
|  | on the supported list, please reach out to us on [Slack](https://slack.open-metadata.org/). | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | If you are interested in enabling the secrets' manager feature, this is our list of supported Secrets Manager  | |||
|  | implementations: | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | - [AWS Secrets Manager](/deployment/secrets-manager/supported-implementations/aws-secrets-manager) | |||
|  | - [AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store](/deployment/secrets-manager/supported-implementations/aws-ssm-parameter-store) | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | Things to take into account when enabling the Secrets Manager feature: | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 1. The migration of all the sensitive data will be done automatically after restarting the OpenMetadata server, which  | |||
|  | can not be undone for the time being. | |||
|  | 2. Only users with permissions can edit and retrieve the service connections. The connection parameters will be hidden  | |||
|  | for all other users. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | ## How it works
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | There are two types of secrets manager implementations. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | ### Managed secrets manager
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | All the sensitive data will be held automatically in the configured secrets manager, i.e., any password field stored in  | |||
|  | the connection parameters of a service, in a bot credentials configuration, or a dbt configuration of an ingestion  | |||
|  | pipeline. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | For example, suppose we create a MySQL service with the name `mysql-test`. In that case, the connection password will be  | |||
|  | stored in the secrets manager using the secret id `/openmetadata/database/mysql-test/password`. When we retrieve the  | |||
|  | connection parameters from the service, the password field will have the value  | |||
|  | `secrets:/openmetadata/database/mysql-test/password`. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | We can also use secrets already stored in our secrets vault using the same convention `secret:{secret_id}`. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | All the sensitive data (the secrets ids in this case) values will be encrypted using the Fernet algorithm as extra  | |||
|  | security protection.   | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | ### Non-managed secrets manager
 | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | On the other hand, the non-managed configuration allows flexibility on how we want to use our secrets vault. Instead of  | |||
|  | automatically storing all the sensitive data, we can use the secrets ids from our secrets vault following the convention  | |||
|  | `secret:{secret_id}` when filling in password fields of the connection parameters of a service, in a bot configuration,  | |||
|  | or a dbt configuration of an ingestion pipeline. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | The rest of the values which don't follow the convention for using a secret will be encrypted using the Fernet algorithm  | |||
|  | as extra security protection. | |||
|  | 
 | |||
|  | 
 |