### dbt meta automated mappings

dbt allows authors to define meta properties for datasets. Checkout this link to know more - [dbt meta](https://docs.getdbt.com/reference/resource-configs/meta). Our dbt source allows users to define
actions such as add a tag, term or owner. For example if a dbt model has a meta config `"has_pii": True`, we can define an action
that evaluates if the property is set to true and add, lets say, a `pii` tag.
To leverage this feature we require users to define mappings as part of the recipe. The following section describes how you can build these mappings. Listed below is a `meta_mapping` and `column_meta_mapping` section that among other things, looks for keys like `business_owner` and adds owners that are listed there.

```yaml
meta_mapping:
  business_owner:
    match: ".*"
    operation: "add_owner"
    config:
      owner_type: user
      owner_category: BUSINESS_OWNER
  has_pii:
    match: True
    operation: "add_tag"
    config:
      tag: "has_pii_test"
  int_property:
    match: 1
    operation: "add_tag"
    config:
      tag: "int_meta_property"
  double_property:
    match: 2.5
    operation: "add_term"
    config:
      term: "double_meta_property"
  data_governance.team_owner:
    match: "Finance"
    operation: "add_term"
    config:
      term: "Finance_test"
  terms_list:
    match: ".*"
    operation: "add_terms"
    config:
      separator: ","
  documentation_link:
    match: "(?:https?)?\:\/\/\w*[^#]*"
    operation: "add_doc_link"
    config:
      link: {{ $match }}
      description: "Documentation Link"
column_meta_mapping:
  terms_list:
    match: ".*"
    operation: "add_terms"
    config:
      separator: ","
  is_sensitive:
    match: True
    operation: "add_tag"
    config:
      tag: "sensitive"
```

We support the following operations:

1. add_tag - Requires `tag` property in config.
2. add_term - Requires `term` property in config.
3. add_terms - Accepts an optional `separator` property in config.
4. add_owner - Requires `owner_type` property in config which can be either user or group. Optionally accepts the `owner_category` config property which can be set to either a [custom ownership type](../../../../docs/ownership/ownership-types.md) urn like `urn:li:ownershipType:architect` or one of `['TECHNICAL_OWNER', 'BUSINESS_OWNER', 'DATA_STEWARD', 'DATAOWNER'` (defaults to `DATAOWNER`).
5. add_doc_link - Requires `link` and `description` properties in config. Upon ingestion run, this will overwrite current links in the institutional knowledge section with this new link. The anchor text is defined here in the meta_mappings as `description`.

Note:

1. The dbt `meta_mapping` config works at the model level, while the `column_meta_mapping` config works at the column level. The `add_owner` operation is not supported at the column level.
2. For string meta properties we support regex matching.

With regex matching, you can also use the matched value to customize how you populate the tag, term or owner fields. Here are a few advanced examples:

#### Data Tier - Bronze, Silver, Gold

If your meta section looks like this:

```yaml
meta:
  data_tier: Bronze # chosen from [Bronze,Gold,Silver]
```

and you wanted to attach a glossary term like `urn:li:glossaryTerm:Bronze` for all the models that have this value in the meta section attached to them, the following meta_mapping section would achieve that outcome:

```yaml
meta_mapping:
  data_tier:
    match: "Bronze|Silver|Gold"
    operation: "add_term"
    config:
      term: "{{ $match }}"
```

to match any data_tier of Bronze, Silver or Gold and maps it to a glossary term with the same name.

#### Case Numbers - create tags

If your meta section looks like this:

```yaml
meta:
  case: PLT-4678 # internal Case Number
```

and you want to generate tags that look like `case_4678` from this, you can use the following meta_mapping section:

```yaml
meta_mapping:
  case:
    match: "PLT-(.*)"
    operation: "add_tag"
     config:
       tag: "case_{{ $match }}"
```

#### Stripping out leading @ sign

You can also match specific groups within the value to extract subsets of the matched value. e.g. if you have a meta section that looks like this:

```yaml
meta:
  owner: "@finance-team"
  business_owner: "@janet"
```

and you want to mark the finance-team as a group that owns the dataset (skipping the leading @ sign), while marking janet as an individual user (again, skipping the leading @ sign) that owns the dataset, you can use the following meta-mapping section.

```yaml
meta_mapping:
  owner:
    match: "^@(.*)"
    operation: "add_owner"
    config:
      owner_type: group
  business_owner:
    match: "^@(?P<owner>(.*))"
    operation: "add_owner"
    config:
      owner_type: user
      owner_category: BUSINESS_OWNER
```

In the examples above, we show two ways of writing the matching regexes. In the first one, `^@(.*)` the first matching group (a.k.a. match.group(1)) is automatically inferred. In the second example, `^@(?P<owner>(.*))`, we use a named matching group (called owner, since we are matching an owner) to capture the string we want to provide to the ownership urn.

### dbt query_tag automated mappings

This works similarly as the dbt meta mapping but for the query tags

We support the below actions -

1. add_tag - Requires `tag` property in config.

The below example set as global tag the query tag `tag` key's value.

```json
"query_tag_mapping":
{
   "tag":
      "match": ".*"
      "operation": "add_tag"
      "config":
        "tag": "{{ $match }}"
}
```

### Integrating with dbt test

To integrate with dbt tests, the `dbt` source needs access to the `run_results.json` file generated after a `dbt test` execution. Typically, this is written to the `target` directory. A common pattern you can follow is:

1. Run `dbt docs generate` and upload `manifest.json` and `catalog.json` to a location accessible to the `dbt` source (e.g. s3 or local file system)
2. Run `dbt test` and upload `run_results.json` to a location accessible to the `dbt` source (e.g. s3 or local file system)
3. Run `datahub ingest -c dbt_recipe.dhub.yaml` with the following config parameters specified
   - test_results_path: pointing to the run_results.json file that you just created

The connector will produce the following things:

- Assertion definitions that are attached to the dataset (or datasets)
- Results from running the tests attached to the timeline of the dataset

#### View of dbt tests for a dataset

![test view](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/datahub-project/static-assets/main/imgs/dbt-tests-view.png)

#### Viewing the SQL for a dbt test

![test logic view](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/datahub-project/static-assets/main/imgs/dbt-test-logic-view.png)

#### Viewing timeline for a failed dbt test

![test view](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/datahub-project/static-assets/main/imgs/dbt-tests-failure-view.png)

#### Separating test result emission from other metadata emission

You can segregate emission of test results from the emission of other dbt metadata using the `entities_enabled` config flag.
The following recipe shows you how to emit only test results.

```yaml
source:
  type: dbt
  config:
    manifest_path: _path_to_manifest_json
    catalog_path: _path_to_catalog_json
    test_results_path: _path_to_run_results_json
    target_platform: postgres
    entities_enabled:
      test_results: Only
```

Similarly, the following recipe shows you how to emit everything (i.e. models, sources, seeds, test definitions) but not test results:

```yaml
source:
  type: dbt
  config:
    manifest_path: _path_to_manifest_json
    catalog_path: _path_to_catalog_json
    run_results_path: _path_to_run_results_json
    target_platform: postgres
    entities_enabled:
      test_results: No
```