Motivation: When using client-certificates on a website on port `443`,
we would normalise the user input with `new URL` but still generate a
"bad" representation of the "origin" internally, since the just do
concatenated "host:port".
(The origin doesn't contain the port in case of :443)
We use `clientCertificatesToTLSOptions` in two places:
a) for APIRequestContext, there we pass one from the URL constructor
over and
b) from the socks proxy, there we **now** also pass a "good one" over.
Test plan: We don't want to run the tests on port :443, so only manually
validated the fix.
Relates https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/issues/31906
Upon calling `browser.close()` or dropping remote connection, make sure
to reject api calls before resolving `browser.close()` and firing a
`disconnected` event.
This change aligns the order guarantee with non-remote case.
This reverts commit 0aa2f06f68959e2515f62ea9bb570cf1815230b2.
Discussed the new permission in the API review and decided not to
proceed with the feature as we are not ready to commit to supporting it
yet:
* the API is Chromium specific
* the API is still experimental
* there is no clarity to what extend the screen manipulation APIs will
work in old headless which is our main test environment
We'll keep an eye on the demand for the feature and may get back to
implementing it in the future.
Reference: https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/issues/27198
Fixes misspellings identified by the [check-spelling
action](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/check-spelling).
The misspellings have been reported at
https://github.com/jsoref/playwright/actions/runs/10015023629#summary-27685777352
The action will report that the changes in this PR would make it happy:
https://github.com/jsoref/playwright/actions/runs/10015023971#summary-27685778305
---
I understand that the commit messages will need to be reworded to match
house style. For the time being, these are merely noting the changes
they contain so that when I rebase or need to drop things, I can. --
I've already rebased once as someone fixed one of the items that my
draft work was going to fix.
---
## Testing
* The tests _mostly_ passed when I managed to trigger them, but there
were a handful of things that I didn't quite understand
* There are a large number of warnings relating to a bad interaction
between any workflow that uses this local action
b535139b32/.github/actions/run-test/action.yml (L74-L80)
and the action it calls -- I've opened Azure/login#474 asking them to
refactor their action so that it doesn't cause so much noise while
running this repository's tests
* I'm vaguely curious as to why this repository has a `branch`
constraint for its `pull_request` events in its workflows -- that
constraint gave me a number of additional headaches while trying to
prepare this branch for this PR.
---------
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
The following actions keep `noWaitAfter` option: `click`, `selectOption`
and `press`.
All other actions that used to have `noWaitAfter` now behave like it was
set to true, not waiting for follow-up navigations. In the docs, this
option is marked as completely ignored.
A small logic change was made to compensate for this behavior: when
waiting for the `hitTargetInterceptor`, we now race it against
navigations to avoid stalling when navigation stalls. Previously,
waiting for the interceptor was disabled when `noWaitAfter` was passed,
and since it's impossible to pass this option now, we mitigate by never
stalling instead.
Fixes#31469.
