mirror of
https://github.com/Unstructured-IO/unstructured.git
synced 2025-12-27 07:03:52 +00:00
a861ed8fe7
**Summary** Use more sophisticated algorithm for splitting oversized `Table` elements into `TableChunk` elements during chunking to ensure element text and HTML are "synchronized" and HTML is always parseable. **Additional Context** Table splitting now has the following characteristics: - `TableChunk.metadata.text_as_html` is always a parseable HTML `<table>` subtree. - `TableChunk.text` is always the text in the HTML version of the table fragment in `.metadata.text_as_html`. Text and HTML are "synchronized". - The table is divided at a whole-row boundary whenever possible. - A row is broken at an even-cell boundary when a single row is larger than the chunking window. - A cell is broken at an even-word boundary when a single cell is larger than the chunking window. - `.text_as_html` is "minified", removing all extraneous whitespace and unneeded elements or attributes. This maximizes the semantic "density" of each chunk.
23 lines
2.2 KiB
JSON
23 lines
2.2 KiB
JSON
[
|
|
{
|
|
"type": "Table",
|
|
"element_id": "32bc8af17151389d3e80f65036f8e65b",
|
|
"text": "January 2023 ( Someone fed my essays into GPT to make something that could answer\nquestions based on them, then asked it where good ideas come from. The\nanswer was ok, but not what I would have said. This is what I would have said.) The way to get new ideas is to notice anomalies: what seems strange,\nor missing, or broken? You can see anomalies in everyday life (much\nof standup comedy is based on this), but the best place to look for\nthem is at the frontiers of knowledge. Knowledge grows fractally.\nFrom a distance its edges look smooth, but when you learn enough\nto get close to one, you'll notice it's full of gaps. These gaps\nwill seem obvious; it will seem inexplicable that no one has tried\nx or wondered about y. In the best case, exploring such gaps yields\nwhole new fractal buds.",
|
|
"metadata": {
|
|
"text_as_html": "<table><tr><td/><td/><td>January 2023 ( Someone fed my essays into GPT to make something that could answer<br/>questions based on them, then asked it where good ideas come from. The<br/>answer was ok, but not what I would have said. This is what I would have said.) The way to get new ideas is to notice anomalies: what seems strange,<br/>or missing, or broken? You can see anomalies in everyday life (much<br/>of standup comedy is based on this), but the best place to look for<br/>them is at the frontiers of knowledge. Knowledge grows fractally.<br/>From a distance its edges look smooth, but when you learn enough<br/>to get close to one, you'll notice it's full of gaps. These gaps<br/>will seem obvious; it will seem inexplicable that no one has tried<br/>x or wondered about y. In the best case, exploring such gaps yields<br/>whole new fractal buds.</td></tr></table>",
|
|
"languages": [
|
|
"eng"
|
|
],
|
|
"filetype": "text/html",
|
|
"data_source": {
|
|
"url": "dropbox:///test-input/nested-2/ideas-page.html",
|
|
"version": "145453788782335405288844961545898675998",
|
|
"record_locator": {
|
|
"protocol": "dropbox",
|
|
"remote_file_path": "dropbox://test-input/",
|
|
"file_id": "id:De4ZYtDd-JoAAAAAAAAADQ"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
] |